An Analysis of Upper Structural System Work Cost Management Factors at Cimanuk Bridge Project at Majalengka, West Java

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Aditya, Muhamad Rizki
dc.contributor.author Bali, Ika
dc.contributor.author Simanjuntak, Manlian Ronald A.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-09-04T10:18:37Z
dc.date.available 2019-09-04T10:18:37Z
dc.date.issued 2018-05-05
dc.identifier.issn 2319-8753
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/418
dc.description.abstract The process of choosing the bridge structural materials has its own uniqueness. At Cimanuk Bridge project, the upper structure material selection is done using concrete material. However, steel structure is the main priority at the construction implementation on site. Furthermore, cost management should be taken into consideration in implementing upper structure work, especially if there is a change order. Construction and the development of infrastructure are fundamental to economic growth and societal advances.Unfortunately, project cost overrun and scope creep are common on infrastructure and construction projects. That is why this research does a systematic analysis to identify structural work costing indicators, specifically for the bridge project. The overall research problems are: analyzing the current condition of construction project budget implementation, identifying the bridge project work costing indicators, analyzing the upper structural system construction project budget using steel and concrete materials for Cimanuk Bridge. However, this research focuses in the process to analyze and identify the bridge structural project work costing indicators. This research uses the research methodology starting from the primary data collection, research findings review, and the recommendation which is expected to bring improvement needed by the project examined. Specifically this project is limited to before the analysis process. The method used is the quantitative method. Based on an analysis of upper structural system work costing management factors, it can be summarized that there are only 2 strong correlationfactor components which are structured in 7 independent variables are chosen at correlation test and inter-correlation test. Component factor 1 consists of X7 (ignoring the risk factor at the project location), X9 (ignoring the inflation and escalation factor), X10 (incomplete contract clause), X13 (too many working repetitions because of bad quality), X14 (the cost of material double order), X15 (the cost for worker wage), X31 (monitoring working performance to the expenses spent on the project). Component factor 2 consists of only X7. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology en_US
dc.subject project cost management, construction, upper structure, bridge en_US
dc.title An Analysis of Upper Structural System Work Cost Management Factors at Cimanuk Bridge Project at Majalengka, West Java en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics